MVP vs MLP: What Should Your Startup Build First?

Everyone knows MVP—Minimum Viable Product. But lately, you might have heard about MLP—Minimum Lovable Product. Is this just buzzword evolution, or is there a real distinction?

Here's the practical difference and how to decide which approach fits your startup.

What's an MVP?

Minimum Viable Product: The simplest version of your product that allows you to test your core hypothesis with real users.

The keyword is viable—it works well enough to get meaningful feedback.

MVP Philosophy

The MVP concept comes from Eric Ries and The Lean Startup. The idea:

1. Build the simplest thing that tests your assumption
2. Get it in front of users fast
3. Learn from their behaviour
4. Iterate based on data

MVP Characteristics

• Focuses on core functionality only
• Minimal design and polish
• Built for learning, not scaling
• May feel rough to users
• Fast and cheap to build

MVP Example

Hypothesis: "People want to book fitness classes online."

MVP: A simple form that captures booking requests, manually processed via email.

No payment system, no scheduling algorithm, no mobile app. Just the core transaction to validate demand.

What's an MLP?

Minimum Lovable Product: The simplest version of your product that creates genuine delight and emotional connection with users.

The keyword is lovable—users don't just use it, they like using it.

MLP Philosophy

The MLP concept emerged from criticism of MVPs that were too minimal—products so bare-bones that users couldn't see the vision or develop any attachment.

The idea:

1. Build something that showcases your differentiated experience
2. Create emotional connection, not just functional utility
3. Generate word-of-mouth through delight
4. Build a foundation users want to return to

MLP Characteristics

• Focuses on core functionality AND core experience
• Thoughtful design and polish in key areas
• Built for engagement and retention
• Feels complete in its limited scope
• Takes longer but creates stronger foundation

MLP Example

Same hypothesis: "People want to book fitness classes online."

MLP: A beautiful booking interface for 5 local studios, with instant confirmation, calendar integration, and a clean mobile experience.

Limited inventory, but the experience of booking feels good.

MVP vs MLP: Direct Comparison

Factor	MVP	MLP
Primary goal	Validate hypothesis	Validate AND create engagement
User experience	Functional but rough	Polished in key areas
Time to build	2-4 weeks	6-12 weeks
Cost	Lower	Higher
User feedback	"Does this solve my problem?"	"Do I love using this?"
Risk	Users don't see the vision	Over-building before validation
Best for	High uncertainty	Competitive markets, experience-dependent products

When to Choose MVP

1. You're Testing a Novel Concept

If you're not sure anyone wants what you're building, validate demand before investing in experience.

Example: A marketplace connecting dog owners with local dog walkers. Does this demand exist in your city? Build a landing page and manual matching before building an app.

2. You're Resource-Constrained

With limited runway, speed matters more than polish. Get to market fast, learn fast, iterate fast.

3. The Problem Is Clear, Solution Is Uncertain

You know the problem exists, but you're not sure which solution works best. Test multiple approaches quickly.

4. B2B with Early Adopters

Enterprise early adopters will tolerate rough products if they solve a real pain point. They'll give feedback on functionality, not design.

5. You Need Quick Investor Validation

Sometimes you need to show traction before raising. An MVP that demonstrates demand is better than an MLP that's still in development.

When to Choose MLP

1. You're Entering a Competitive Market

If competitors exist, users have expectations. A rough MVP will be unfavourably compared to polished alternatives.

Example: Building a note-taking app. Users compare everything to Notion, Apple Notes, and Obsidian. Your MVP needs to feel good to even get a fair hearing.

2. User Experience IS the Product

For some products, the experience is the value proposition. An MVP that strips the experience strips the value.

Example: A meditation app. The calm, beautiful interface IS the product. A rough MVP misses the point entirely.

3. You're Building for Word-of-Mouth

Products that spread through recommendations need to be share-worthy. No one recommends "it's rough but it works."

4. You're Targeting Non-Technical Users

Consumers expect polish. They'll abandon products that feel unfinished, even if functionality is there.

5. You've Already Validated Demand

If you know people want this (through research, waitlist, or previous MVP), invest in an experience that converts interest into retention.

The Hybrid Approach: Minimum Viable + Lovable

In practice, the best approach is often a combination:

MVP for Core Functionality

Validate that your core value proposition works. Does the fundamental transaction happen? Do users come back?

MLP for Key Moments

Polish the moments that matter most:

• First impression: The signup and onboarding experience
• Core action: The main thing users come to do
• Aha moment: The point where users "get it"

Let other areas remain functional but unpolished.

Example: Hybrid Approach

Product: A platform connecting startups with fractional executives.

MVP elements:

• Basic matching algorithm
• Simple profiles
• Email-based communication

MLP elements:

• Beautiful landing page that establishes credibility
• Smooth onboarding that captures key information elegantly
• Clean profile presentation that builds trust

The transaction is MVP, but the trust-building moments are MLP.

How to Decide: A Framework

Ask yourself these questions:

1. What's Your Primary Risk?

• "Will anyone want this?" → MVP (validate demand first)
• "Can we win against alternatives?" → MLP (differentiate through experience)

2. Who Are Your First Users?

• Early adopters / technologists → MVP is fine
• Mainstream consumers → MLP expectations

3. What's Your Runway?

• < 6 months → MVP, get data fast
• 12+ months → Consider MLP investment

4. Is Experience Part of Your Differentiation?

• Competing on price/features → MVP
• Competing on experience → MLP

5. How Crowded Is the Market?

• New category → MVP
• Established category → MLP

Common Mistakes

MVP Mistakes

1. Too minimal: Users can't understand the vision or give useful feedback
2. No hypothesis: Building without clear learning objectives
3. Ignoring retention: Validating signup but not repeat usage
4. Staying in MVP mode: Never graduating to a real product

MLP Mistakes

1. Over-investing before validation: Beautiful product nobody wants
2. Perfectionism: Endless polish delays learning
3. Polishing the wrong things: Great settings page, mediocre core feature
4. Scope creep: "Minimum" becomes maximum

The Bottom Line

MVP and MLP aren't opposing philosophies—they're tools for different situations.

Choose MVP when:

• You need to validate demand quickly
• Resources are extremely limited
• You're serving forgiving early adopters

Choose MLP when:

• You're entering a competitive market
• Experience is your differentiation
• You've already validated demand

Most often, use both:

• MVP for testing core functionality
• MLP polish for key moments that drive conversion and retention

The goal is always the same: build something users want, as efficiently as possible. How much polish that requires depends on your market, your users, and your stage.

---

Need help defining what to build first? Our fractional CTO services include product strategy and technical roadmap development.